The War
Headlines
Movies
Screenshots
Alliance Community
2011: We're Back!

Alliance: The Silent War

Community Forums for Alliance: The Silent War
It is currently Sun Oct 25, 2020 5:38 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 6:47 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
As the topic states, I am curious if game speed will be more realistic than most/all games currently are, and if that would be controlled by the realism level... Reloading a carbine takes longer than 3 seconds for the average and even above average trained professionals... I'd say in upwards of 6 seconds for someone who is shakey and stressed due to fire... Also, transitioning from a dead run to stop takes space and is not an instant thing, and I'd like to see that shown in game if at all possible... Oh, also, can you transition from strong-hand to off-hand for peaking/snap shooting around corners that are on your weak side? That would be really great... Also, will there be a way to move your head independently of your torso? If you'd like clarification on my ideas, by all means ask! :-D

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:42 am 
Offline
Four Star General
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:05 pm
Posts: 1071
Location: New York, NY
Reload times will be as accurate as we can make them. However keep in mind that for the most part you will be very highly trained and also have a lot of combat experience, so giving you a lowest common denominator ability to reload wouldn't make much sense.

Our movement code is momentum based, so instant speed/direction transitions are not possible, yet the controls still feel very responsive.

Week hand transitions aren't possible with our system without doubling the number of animations, as mirroring all the geometry/animations to switch handedness as most games do is wrong (as the weapon mechanisms would now be on the wrong side, which we will not do). As such, doing so would require that we double the number of animations that each gun would require, which isn't a small feat.

As for moving the head, do you mean having some kind of free look capability without changing your aim? If so, then no that is not planned at the moment. Otherwise, can you alaborate a bit further?

_________________
Alliance Developer, Sox34's not-so-secret identity, & NZG Central Command
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." — Unknown Philosopher


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 3:20 pm 
Offline
Major General
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 9:59 pm
Posts: 1027
Location: Houston, TX
Sox34 wrote:
Our movement code is momentum based, so instant speed/direction transitions are not possible, yet the controls still feel very responsive.


What do you mean by momentum based Sox? Like, it takes a while to get up to a full blown run, or that it takes a small bit of time to slow down and come to a complete stop?

_________________
Image
"Dream a little bit
This is the kush to your lighter"

The NZG Specialist, Stick Wielder, Shotgun Extraordinaire


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 5:41 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:51 am
Posts: 284
Location: Mass
"Our movement code is momentum based, so instant speed/direction transitions are not possible, yet the controls still feel very responsive."

AWSOME!

Basically what this means is people can't just alternately tap strafe left & right in an attempt to dodge bullets or throw off the aim of a sniper trying to lead a target. Best general example of a momentum based movement system for characters is Madden. ( i know it's not the same genere, but just about everyone's played it) In Madden you can't just instantly change the direction your moving in to try and fake out the defense. I think that OFP used this, and i know Infiltration did as well (yeah yeah, i know Infiltration this and that) and it did a semi good job of stoping the tactic commonly known as "rushing" as well as "circle strafing".

May i also suggest that movement speeds in reverse be limited. Nobody can run backwards (at least not without tripping over stuff, espically when on uneven outdoor terrain.) at the same speeds they can forwards.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 11:02 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
Yeah that momentum thing is really awesome... I'm glad to hear that you'll be mocapping the animations also, that rocks!

I was thinking yeah, having a toggle that you can hit and after hitting it, you'd be able to move your head left right up down and everything in between and after hitting the toggle again you'd be moved back to the original position...

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 12:08 pm 
Offline
Master Sergeant
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 10:51 am
Posts: 284
Location: Mass
People naturually aim where they're looking (even when the don't intend it). It's not a phenominon that's strictly limited to firearms either. Early fighter pilots noted that when a pilot turned to look over their shoulder (to see if the enemy was still on their tail) that they would instinctivly roll the plane slightly in that direction. When your driving and get distracted (pretty girl on the sidewalk for example) you uncounsciously steer the car in the direction your looking. When shooting, changing your focus from the front post to the target will instinctivly throw off your aim (usually toward the 12' O'clock since you tend to peer above the sights)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 02, 2006 3:46 pm 
Offline
Sergeant First Class

Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:19 pm
Posts: 258
Silent wrote:
Reloading a carbine takes longer than 3 seconds for the average and even above average trained professionals...


I am not a professional, nor do I play one on TV. But I can reload my CETME in 5 seconds, from an empty chamber. With the magazines that drop free, anyways. Some of them haven't been properly busted in. This is a slow reload, due to the charging handle being on the far end of the rifle. An AR-15 can be reloaded faster, you don't have to rock the magazine in and you just whack the bolt reload. A reload with one in the chamber is even faster.

Quote:
I'd say in upwards of 6 seconds for someone who is shakey and stressed due to fire


I doubt we'll be playing a scared and shivering conscript in the game. Through training and experience you can grow accustomed to stress and adrenaline.

_________________
Image


Last edited by Feanaro on Tue Sep 05, 2006 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 04, 2006 2:33 pm 
Offline
Four Star General
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:05 pm
Posts: 1071
Location: New York, NY
Spiffinz wrote:
Sox34 wrote:
Our movement code is momentum based, so instant speed/direction transitions are not possible, yet the controls still feel very responsive.


What do you mean by momentum based Sox? Like, it takes a while to get up to a full blown run, or that it takes a small bit of time to slow down and come to a complete stop?

Like DEFkon elaborated, it actually means both. Basically we adhere to Newton's laws of motions, and as such, objects at rest try to stay at rest and objects in motion try to stay in motion and will only change velocity by applying a reasonable force. As such you'll be accelerating and decelerating organically in all directions.

_________________
Alliance Developer, Sox34's not-so-secret identity, & NZG Central Command
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." — Unknown Philosopher


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:24 am 
Offline
Sergeant First Class

Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2006 3:29 am
Posts: 270
Sox34 wrote:
Like DEFkon elaborated, it actually means both. Basically we adhere to Newton's laws of motions, and as such, objects at rest try to stay at rest and objects in motion try to stay in motion and will only change velocity by applying a reasonable force. As such you'll be accelerating and decelerating organically in all directions.


Who would of thought that Sox34 is a physicist too. :)

Force=mass X acceleration (F=ma)
In english: The force of a moving body is equal to the product of its mass and relative acceration.

Momentum = mass X velocity
In english: The faster on object moves, the harder it is to change the direction or speed of that object.

Physics lesson over.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 8:37 am 
Offline
Private First Class

Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm
Posts: 19
Location: Richmond,Va.
Well I know if I hear bullets whizzing by I am going to take some kind of cover or at least duck which will affect my speed. But lets say like in the video all heck breaks loose and tanks are being blown up right next to you all while you were in a "sneakin" mode kinda sorta....it was quiet and noone was around then all of a sudden BOOM-CRASH-....that would scare the crap out of me.....if that happened in real life I know I would run ALOT faster than if I saw someone coming after me. So, acceleraton is based on many factors as well as deceleration. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:37 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
Hey Sox are we looking at the ability to be knocked over by blasts as well?

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 10:16 am 
Offline
Four Star General
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 5:05 pm
Posts: 1071
Location: New York, NY
Silent wrote:
Hey Sox are we looking at the ability to be knocked over by blasts as well?

By gunshots, no.

You'll definitely be flung about by explosives, though you'll most likely be dead if that's the case.

_________________
Alliance Developer, Sox34's not-so-secret identity, & NZG Central Command
"Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur." — Unknown Philosopher


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 7:23 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
K, thx.

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:19 pm 
Offline
Private

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 9:42 pm
Posts: 10
Location: MA
DEFkon wrote:
When your driving and get distracted (pretty girl on the sidewalk for example) you uncounsciously steer the car in the direction your looking.
Amen to that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 10:51 am 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:01 am
Posts: 82
Location: The Netherlands
poor girl

If you drop your stance, wil you slide like in GRAW


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:48 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
I hope not.

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:04 am 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:01 am
Posts: 82
Location: The Netherlands
something like that would be realistic. In almost every game you walk slower when you chrough, wich is pretty realistic. You cant run and stay low at the same time. But if you run and then suddenly drop stance it would be unnatural that you slow down immidiatly. If you look at the biginning of this toppic you see that the devs are trying to solve this with momentum based movement codes, but i was wondering in how this affects what happens if you pres c in full run.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 4:24 pm 
Offline
Staff Sergeant

Joined: Wed May 24, 2006 10:22 pm
Posts: 162
I just don't want it to be as exaggerated as in GRAW.

"Oh hey, this ice ground looks like dirt; my 250$ combat boots must not grip this very well..."

_________________
Image
"There are over 550 million firearms in worldwide circulation. That's one firearm for every twelve people on the planet. The only question is: How do we arm the other 11?"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 12:46 pm 
Offline
Corporal

Joined: Mon Jul 03, 2006 11:01 am
Posts: 82
Location: The Netherlands
Thats true


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group